Watch · Grade · Reach
Lead FlowsBETA
Your competitors spend every day earning attention — Lead Flows hands you the people giving it. Watch who comments, replies, and complains across their public channels; mine months of that engagement into a graded, reachable contact list; open with what each person actually said. Warm outreach for you or your clients, segmented by competitor and ranked by intent — drawn fresh, never from a stale cold-email list.
The Warmest List an Agency Can Pull
The people already engaging your competitors — mined into a graded contact list
Every comment and reply on a competitor's page is a hand raised in your category — a real person, publicly active, reachable today. One mine turns 90 days of that attention into emails with context: who each person is, what they said, and which ones are unhappy with the competitor — segmented by competitor, so the outreach writes itself. A small scan shows you the size of the audience first.
About a minute. Counts every post and the engagement on it.
Live progress the whole way — and it keeps working if you leave the page.
The Daily Watch
Who raised a hand at their content — graded, every day
A monitored channel sweeps daily: new posts, and the people engaging them. Claude reads each new face against your brand strategy and grades with the reason showing — the noise is ranked down, never thrown away.
Attention, not guesswork
Everyone here did something — commented, replied, joined, posted. Public activity in the category is the signal you start from.
Fresh every morning
A sweep surfaces only new faces — everyone already seen is remembered, so each morning's read is new signal, never yesterday re-served.
The grade ranks, it never deletes
Lower-graded people keep their row, their words, and their enrichability under “Also engaged.” Your market, your call.
One Person, Fully Read
Not a name on a list — a person with context
Every surfaced person carries the evidence: what they engaged, what they actually said, who they are, and how to reach them — so the first sentence of your outreach writes itself.
“The lip-sync still drifts on longer takes — I've been comparing alternatives for our pipeline…”
Why A: authored a substantive evaluation of the competitor's product — role, words and topic all fit the brief.
A to D against your brand strategy — an A requires their own words with real signal, printed right on the row.
Business type from their own headline and words — the column that turns a list into an ICP filter.
Email with its deliverability status and where it came from — published by them, or found and verified. Location shown, including overseas.
A Different Breed of List
The list anyone can buy — and the one only attention builds
Apollo, Clay, ZoomInfo — a cold database is a phone book: name, title, company, identical for everyone with a login, and silent on whether the person is even in the market. Lead Flows builds its list from public attention on your competitors' channels — every row is someone already spending their time in your category, caught the week it happened, with their words attached.
The same export everyone else bought. A filter match says who they are — never where their head is.
No one can sell you this list — it didn't exist until these people engaged.
A bought row could sit anywhere on this line. A Lead Flows row starts in the deep half — placed by what they publicly did and said.
The Deliverable
A spreadsheet you'd hand to a client
Styled, filterable, CRM-ready — every contact graded and classified, best fits on top. Every email you hold ships, and the competitor's own staff never make the list.
Real header filters on every column — Business Type is the one that turns 130 rows into just the ones that fit your ICP. Analysis, their words, the post link and provenance ride along.
A second sheet spells out every column and every email status — the file makes sense on its own, forwarded or imported.
It's a real spreadsheet — import it into any CRM or send tool you already use. Your data walks out the door with you.
How agencies work it
Tell Claude who the competitors are
Name them — even just their websites — and Claude finds their public channels: the LinkedIn company page, the X account, the owner groups where their buyers gather. Every candidate arrives with real numbers on its face (members, followers, posting pace), and Claude tells you which ones it looked at and passed on, with a reason each.
Scan before you commit
One small scan counts how many people engaged a channel over 30, 60 or 90 days — plus the honest odds of finding emails on that platform. You see the real size of the audience, and which competitors' crowds are worth mining, before anything big runs.
Mine it, or watch it daily
Mine: every person in the window is checked for an email, the ones with emails are graded A to D, and the list lands sorted best-first. Or monitor: a daily sweep pulls new posts and the people engaging them, graded with visible reasons — new signal every morning.
Export and go to work
One click downloads the channel's contacts as a real spreadsheet — graded, filterable, with who each person is, what they said, and where the email came from. Filter the Business Type column to your ICP, start at the A's, and send from your own tools.
What's inside
Claude builds the flow
Give it competitor names — even domain-style entries — and Claude resolves their real channels through their own websites, probes each one, and proposes only what's worth watching. Rejected candidates are remembered and never re-proposed; everything it passed on is listed with a one-line reason.
Three kinds of ground
Competitor watch (their LinkedIn page, their X account), owner groups (public communities where your client's buyers self-identify), and topic searches (crafted, high-intent X searches). Each flow keeps one focus, and you can always ask Claude for more channels.
Daily sweeps
A monitored channel sweeps once a day — new posts, plus the people who commented, replied, or reacted, graded as they land. Pause anytime; resuming picks up where it left off.
Graded with the reason showing
Claude reads every new face against your brand strategy and grades A to D — and the reason is printed on the row. An A requires their own words with real signal: a question, a pain point, an evaluation. A reaction alone proves attention, never context, so reaction-only engagers cap at B.
Business type on every person
Where their headline or words show it, each person carries what they actually are — “ad agency”, “SaaS growth lead”, “CGI/VFX generalist”. Filter one column and the exact slice of the audience you sell to becomes a list.
Unhappy customers, flagged
When someone's own words complain about the competitor — a support gripe, a quality complaint, unmet needs — they're flagged as an unhappy customer. People actively comparing tools get a shopping flag. Evidence-based, never inferred from a like: top-shelf context for any sales team.
Ranked, never deleted
Grading orders the list; it never takes people away. Lower-graded people fold under “Also engaged” with a neutral one-word label — still readable, still yours to contact. You paid for the pull; you decide who matters.
Their actual words, on the row
Commenters and repliers carry what they wrote, in full — the post they responded to is readable in place, and long replies are recovered whole, not clipped to a preview. On X, likes are private by the platform's own design, so the repliers you see are the entire visible engagement — every one of them authored something.
Published emails, harvested automatically
When a person has published their email themselves — in a bio, a post — monitoring captures it, and the row is born with it. The export includes them automatically.
Scan for contacts first
Before a mine, a small scan counts the window: how many people engaged, and the honest odds for that platform — emails typically land for 30–50% of the people checked on LinkedIn, 20–40% on X. No commitment until you've seen the numbers.
The mine: emails, period
A one-time deep pull per channel: every person in the window is checked for an email, the ones with emails are graded, and the list lands A to D with the competitor's own staff excluded — and it keeps working if you leave the page, surviving any interruption without losing your pull.
Enrich the ones you pick
On any monitored channel, tick the people worth reaching and resolve who they are — email, title, company, location — with honest per-platform odds shown before you commit.
A memory that compounds
Every flow remembers who it has seen across all its channels. Repeat engagers surface as repeat engagers instead of being re-judged, and each sweep gets sharper as the flow ages — the morning read is always new signal, never a re-run.
The export is yours
A real spreadsheet, styled and filterable: every contact with grade, business type, signal, a one-line analysis, their words, the post link, and where the email came from — best fits on top, a Read Me sheet explaining every column, and the compliance note traveling inside the file.
- Email yields are honest ranges from live runs: typically 30–50% of the people checked on LinkedIn, 20–40% on X. Most X repliers keep no public contact — the scan says so up front.
- Mining is a one-time pull per channel; scans can be re-run on any window until you commit. Monitoring continues independently either way.
- Grades rank, never remove — a D is still a person with a row, their words, and (if found) their email at the bottom of your export. The one exclusion: the competitor's own staff never make the list.
- On X, likes are private by the platform's design — the repliers you see are the entire visible engagement, and every one of them wrote something.
- Locations are shown for everyone, including overseas contacts — you are the data's controller, and the compliance reminder travels inside every export.
- Nothing is ever sent for you — Lead Flows finds, grades and documents; the outreach happens from your own tools.
You choose what to watch and what to mine — competitor by competitor.